Tim Gunn Don’t Want No Ratajkowski Titties

Fashion maven Tim Gunn expressed his outrage over a dress worn by Emily Ratajkowski to a Harper’s Bazaar event. Ratajkowski had the temerity to show off her big sweet titties during New York Fashion Week, the Yom Kippur for gay men. Gunn took to Fashion Police:

This dress is so appallingly vulgar and revealing. Why wear anything? Why not just take it all off?

Whoa, easy there, Gunn. You’re about to give away the Emperor’s New Clothes secret to the industry that pays you handsomely. Every one of these chicks would look entirely better without wardrobe. Why pay two grand to cover up any part of what you’re ultimately selling? Porsche car covers are nice. You don’t see the Porsche’s in the showroom draped in them. Fashion is a ruse. They’re eating people.

Ratajkowski could have dropped the salient point about her tits being her paycheck but instead remembered her Bernie Sanders rallies and went conventional feminist strawman:

Western men in 2016: Want to ban women abroad from voluntarily covering themselves at the beach…then want women to cover up their ‘vulgar’ bodies at home.

That doesn’t make sense in even the two seconds I’ve stopped looking at your tits to consider. It certainly doesn’t apply to gay liberal men in their 60’s complaining about young women in revealing outfits insisting men tribute their social media photos.

Sexism can’t be the answer to every criticism ever lobbed by a man at a woman. You’re imploding your own fake cause. Lena Dunham is fat. Hillary Clinton is dying from Zika. And that dress is hella slutty. Not sexist, merely true. The last one being complimentary.

_{Photo Credit: Splash}