ADVERTISEMENT

Kesha Loses Again

March 22, 2017 | celebrity | Lex Jurgen | 0 Comments

Kesha’s quest to be released from her music contract with Dr. Luke continues to go very poorly. She opened with the allegations of being drugged and raped and moved down the ladder from there. Misreading Sun Tzu will buy you an 0-12 record in court.

A judge issued another ruling against Kesha’s legal team in their never ending series of pleadings to cancel her three album deal with Dr. Luke and Sony. Much of what’s left to argue revolves around the fact that Kesha never sent a thirty-day notice to quit her contract. Typing is hard. Her team claims they didn’t follow protocol of the agreement because they felt it would be futile under the circumstances. The judge mostly smirked as he ruled against her once again. Dr. Luke raped her with his eyes via Skype.

Kesha’s fans remain convinced their songbird is being stifled by an evil record producer and corporate co-conspirators. That’s maybe ten-percent right. The FreeKesha hashtag hasn’t exactly caught fire, but its mere existence provides proof that nobody under thirty visits reasonably reliable news outlets. Or reads.

There’s a lesson to be learned here about not falsely accusing your boss of rape when you work at a job you can’t easily quit. There are better ways to advance a GoFundMe victim page. Taylor Swift’s 250 grand check still arrives. She’s not stupid, but she really dislikes men. When you wonder what might’ve been had Kesha been allowed to make music the past four years, you will smirk like the judge.

Photo Credit: Fameflynet.com

Tags: kesha photos




Disclaimer: All rights reserved for writing and editorial content. No rights or credit claimed for any images featured on wwtdd.com unless stated. If you own rights to any of the images because YOU ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHER and do not wish them to appear here, please contact us info(@)egotastic.com and they will be promptly removed. If you are a representative of the photographer, provide signed documentation in your query that you are acting on that individual's legal copyright holder status.

Advertisement


Advertisement


Related Post

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement