ADVERTISEMENT
February 3, 2011 | celebrity | editor | 0 Comments
It was a busy day yesterday for stray cat Lindsay Lohan, including a visit with her probation officer to explain why she stole a necklace while the DA prepares to determine if she’ll face prosecution, but now TMZ is saying, poorly, that the case against her might not be that strong.
Lindsay Lohan’s defense to grand theft is that she was told the by the owner of Kamofie & Company that she could take the necklace on loan … and the surveillance video doesn’t prove otherwise because there’s no audio.
And Lindsay has two other things going for her … the jeweler knew where she lived and knew how to get in touch yet never contacted her about getting the necklace back.
And Lindsay may have made some bonehead moves in the past, but wearing a stolen item knowing she’d be photographed is almost beyond belief.
All three of those points are laugh-out-loud stupid, but none more so than the last one, because in 2008 that’s precisely how she got caught stealing a fur coat, and then again last April for wearing a stolen Rolex. And was the store really supposed to track her down themselves? Is that how it works now? We have to catch our own criminals? Like, on a horse with a net, and just throw it over people who stole my bread? Can I throw a trident at someone too? Because now this is starting to sound pretty good.