ADVERTISEMENT
June 16, 2010 | celebrity | editor | 0 Comments
(note – the pictures of Joy Riddle from my facebook aren’t relevant in any way but i feel really bad about two posts in a row on this creep, so she’s here to make this post tolerable.)
Disfigured blogger Perez Hilton has made a video about the Miley Cyrus incident (see it on USA Today here), and he asks if we really think she would go out without underwear and if we think he would be stupid enough to post pictures if she did. Yes. Yes.
He claims she was clearly wearing underwear. You may notice NO ONE else is posting these pictures. Try and guess why. And if she was clearly wearing underwear then there would have been no reason for him to take the picture down. And yet that’s what he did almost immediately Sunday night. If she’s clearly wearing underwear he should have no trouble hosting the picture again. When someone acts guilty, they’re probably guilty. Also keep in mind how he described the picture:
If you are easily offended, do NOT click here. Oh, Miley! Warning: truly not for the easily offended!
Doesn’t really sound like someone describing a picture of a girl in her underwear does it? I only mention all this to stir up as much heat as possible so maybe someone will do something. You have to tread very lightly when dealing with a teen girl. Later of course, when she gets married, you can do whatever you want because she becomes the mans property. If she doesn’t like it, maybe her best friends the broom and the dustpan can talk some sense into her.